One-Year Fix: How The Guv's Tax Plan Is Actually Going To Work Out
The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette, which actually spends quite a bit of time and thought on its editorial page, runs a lengthy and informative column by Karen Francisco this morning explaining why the Guv's tax relief plan isn't even close to long-term reform, no matter how many times he says it is:
Much of the complexity of the new law lies in the property tax caps the governor insisted were necessary to make tax relief permanent. A companion resolution, Senate Joint Resolution 1, triggers the process of amending the state constitution because its current language – requiring a "uniform and equal rate of property assessment and taxation" – doesn't work with a tax plan that taxes homes, apartments and businesses at different rates.
The proposed amendment must now be approved by a separately elected General Assembly in 2009 and then ratified by a majority of Indiana voters. By 2010, residential property taxes would be limited to 1 percent of their assessed value, so that the tax bill on a home assessed at $100,000 would never exceed $1,000. For apartments and other residential property, the cap is 2 percent. Commercial property would be capped at 3 percent.
The caps have been inaccurately described as circuit-breakers, but true tax circuit-breakers include a mechanism for making up revenue lost to the caps. In Indiana, local units of government and schools will simply lose the money they would have collected from property owners who hit the 1 percent mark. Business owners, with three times the tax exposure, are much less likely to benefit from the caps.
It's the classification of taxpayers that is bothersome. Moses said the higher tax caps for businesses could affect the state’s competitiveness.
"It has serious economic consequences," he said. "When we tax business property at a higher rate than others, our neighbors are going to use that against us. … This could be a very detrimental bill for jobs."




Recent Comments